A Paper VII
Now let us look
briefly at the words 'transform' and 'transcend', words that are casually
thrown about by translators and interpreters alike. Both are anti-incarnational
and theologically inaccurate. In the Christian understanding, the word that
should be used is trans-figure, because when the contents of the self-conscious
mind are submitted to deep mind, the way we figure things out is changed; we are given a new perspective on our
interpretations that we call experience. The word 'transform' is wrong because
in the process of deification frogs are not changed into princes. They remain
frogs, but are transfigured into glorified frogs. Jesus in the resurrection is
still wounded, but his wounds are glorified. The word 'transcend' is equally
anti-incarnational: nothing is left behind. Nothing is wasted. It is through
our wounds, become Christ's wounds, that we are healed. That is to say, it is
through our wounds that we become kenotic, self-outpouring, of which the cross
is the sign.
The Importance of the Word Behold
As I have already
published a paper on the word behold, I
will confine myself to the briefest of remarks. Because we have lost the
practice of observing our own minds and the model of the two ways of knowing,
we have also lost the sense of the importance of the word behold and its nuances both in scripture and in subsequent
texts that are written by people who are soaked in the language of scripture. In consequence, our translations in English have
become increasingly flattened, banal and clumsy, if not just plain wrong. Although it is not frequently used in
contemporary English, this word is not archaic: one can find it even in
advertising, not to mention newspapers. It also can be heard in broadcast news.
Uneducated people use it intuitively and correctly. The word occurs in the
imperative more than 1300 times in the original languages of the bible; it is
arguably the most important word in the bible because it sums up everything
that ever has been said and ever can be said about the human seeking of and
relationship with God. Patristic and medieval writers frequently use the word
'behold'—yet the word is rarely translated. As we have already noted, the Cloud author, for example, uses the word thirty-five
times; it is a word essential to understanding both his text and the bible.
This single word
sums up all that the bible is try to say: 'behold' is the first word that God
speaks directly to the new humans after creating and blessing them; everything
that follows—the serpent, and so forth—arises from a refusal to behold. The
only thing God ever asks of human beings is to behold. Beholding transgresses
the self-conscious mind and opens the person to what is given beyond the merely
linear, that is, it opens the person to the fountain of wisdom in deep mind and
the unfolding truth of the self, which
is always hidden from the person whose self it is.
Silence is
context and end, beholding the means. In the final analysis this is all we need
to know.
4 Comments:
Hi Maggie,
I was saddened to read in your last post the Roman Catholic guidelines relating to the Divine Offfice. Many years ago while attending university a few of my fellow students had been invited by a priest to pray with him Vespers and Compline each evening. Although the official Church position appears to really miss the mark,this priest clearly got the point.
The Roman Catholic guidlines on the Divine Office gave me that same feeling in my gut when I read Jesus' response to the Canaanite woman... "It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs."
Kevin
Maggie,
Is this paper available? Your opening paragraph for this latest post saod much to me.
Theo
Theo, the last seven posts are the first part of the paper; I will post the rest in a few days.
Maggie,
Thanks.
Theo
Post a Comment
<< Home