Extract from 'Ten Billion' by Stephen Emmott
Humans—the Real Threat to Life on Earth
[With apologies for Blogger that won't accept my formatting!]
Earth
is home to millions of species. Just one dominates it. Us. Our cleverness, our
inventiveness and our activities have modified almost every part of our planet.
In fact, we are having a profound impact on it. Indeed, our cleverness, our
inventiveness and our activities are now the drivers of every global problem we
face. And every one of these problems is accelerating as we continue to grow
towards a global population
of 10 billion. In fact, I believe we can rightly call the situation we're
in right now an emergency – an unprecedented planetary emergency.
We
humans emerged as a species about 200,000 years ago. In geological time, that
is really incredibly recent. Just 10,000 years ago, there were one million of
us. By 1800, just over 200 years ago, there were 1 billion of us. By 1960,
50 years ago, there were 3 billion of us. There are now over
7 billion of us. By 2050, your children, or your children's children, will
be living on a planet with at least 9 billion other people. Some time
towards the end of this century, there will be at least 10 billion of us.
Possibly more.
We
got to where we are now through a number of civilisation- and society-shaping
"events", most notably the agricultural revolution, the scientific
revolution, the industrial revolution and – in the West – the public-health
revolution. By 1980, there were 4 billion of us on the planet. Just 10 years
later, in 1990, there were 5 billion of us. By this point initial signs of
the consequences of our growth were starting to show. Not the least of these
was on water. Our demand for water – not just the water we drank but the water
we needed for food production and to make all the stuff we were consuming – was
going through the roof. But something was starting to happen to water.
Back
in 1984, journalists reported from Ethiopia about a famine of biblical
proportions caused by widespread drought. Unusual drought, and unusual
flooding, was increasing everywhere: Australia, Asia, the US, Europe. Water, a
vital resource we had thought of as abundant, was now suddenly something that
had the potential to be scarce.
By
2000 there were 6 billion of us. It was becoming clear to the world's
scientific community that the accumulation of CO2, methane and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere – as a result of
increasing agriculture, land use and the production, processing and
transportation of everything we were consuming – was changing the climate. And
that, as a result, we had a serious problem on our hands; 1998 had been the
warmest year on record. The 10 warmest years on record have occurred since
1998.
We hear the term "climate" every
day, so it is worth thinking about what we actually mean by it. Obviously,
"climate" is not the same as weather. The climate is one of the
Earth's fundamental life support systems, one that determines whether or not we
humans are able to live on this planet. It is generated by four components: the
atmosphere (the air we breathe); the hydrosphere (the planet's water); the
cryosphere (the ice sheets and glaciers); the biosphere (the planet's plants
and animals). By now, our activities had started to modify every one of these
components.
3 Comments:
Since you’ve taken this from the Guardian site, you might also be interested in this analysis of Emmott’s work
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jul/09/stephen-emmott-population-book-misanthropic
Chris Goodall supports the aims that you and Emmott espouse. I don’t. Nonetheless, I support entirely Chris’s analysis, since it’s based on reason and logic. Alex Cull and I have made some of the same points at
http://geoffchambers.wordpress.com/category/stephen-emmott/
I haven't the faintest notion who Emmott is; I know only that the extract in the Observer echoed the alarms that are coming from every quarter.
In my view we have passed the point of no return. I left Alaska because I couldn't bear to watch the environmental catastrophe unfolding before our eyes that we saw from one day to the next.
But out of sight is not out of mind and even though it is probably too late, we can at least go out with a modicum of decency, responsibility and apology to all the life systems we have destroyed.
I should add that it is precisely reason and logic divorced from genuine knowledge, integration and understanding that have got us into this mess in the first place. Mere linear logic cuts no ice in environmental studies any more than they guarantee pharmaceuticals that won't kill people.
Post a Comment
<< Home