Human Tragedy
"I simply
can't believe it's the same person!"
"Why did he
do it? What possible motivation could he have had?"
How many times
have we heard these sentences during the pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers and
beyond? Remarks such as these reveal a mentality that is out of touch with knowledge
of what it means to be a human being and blind to our cultural matrix: we should never forget that each of us is
capable of anything, given sufficient context and provocation.
Next, the
amount of repression, schmoozing and masking required to live successfully in a
culture such as ours that is based on competitive materialism, appearances, and
spin, as opposed to authenticity and integrity, can arouse unbearable
conflicts, in sensitive, intelligent, impressionable people, especially those who come from life-threatening situations in
which everyone's life is on the line. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev seems to have been such
a person.
And though she came from a very different background to the Tsarnaevs, these conflicts also arose in my
classmate, Diana Oughton, who, as a member of the Weather Underground, blew up
a house on West 11th Street in New York City while she was making
bombs to kill and maim servicemen and women at a dance in New Jersey. Some people who knew her at that time say she set it off
deliberately.
Das was the daughter of a
wealthy banker, privately educated. She had a stable midwestern childhood and,
from a material point of view, everything a young girl could desire. She was
attractive, popular, and intelligent. She was physically graceful and
accomplished, a leading member of the modern dance club at Madeira School. She
was accepted by all seven of the Ivy
League Seven Sisters when she applied for college. She obtained a degree from
Bryn Mawr.
She then began to
work with poor children in the USA and in Guatemala. Their plight cut her to
the quick. She was horrified by poverty and squalor, by the indifference and corruption of governments and individuals. She became increasingly torn: she hated the impact of affluence on
society, but she equally despised Marxism. From all accounts she felt increasingly
alien from everyone, personally and culturally, including herself. She
fragmented every political pressure groups she belonged to, including the
Weathermen, becoming ever more radical. One friend who saw her in the days
before the bomb shredded her body said that she and her friends seemed
disoriented, incapable of making rational decisions. One might say her
terrorism arose from her having been terrorised by the state of the world.
Remember the
Unabomber? He was perhaps another person of this stripe. A lot of people agreed
with much of what was in his manifesto, though they completely rejected his
violent tactics. And reaching back a little further into history, whoever would
have thought that the mild-mannered pastor, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, would become
part of a group that attempted to murder Hitler?
It doesn't take a
mentor, or a conspiracy, or an organisation to make a terrorist: it takes a
culture of extremity, whether that culture expresses its extremity as the
idolatry of materialism, religious fanaticism or genocide. Every time an event such
as the Boston marathon bombing takes place, we need to look hard at the stresses our
own culture puts on people, far more than we need to look outside and beyond
our selves and our international borders in a paranoid search for aliens
conspiring against us.
7 Comments:
I think your final para sums it up completely. We never seem to look at our part in creating the circumstances that lead to these sort of events.
'we should never forget that each of us is capable of anything, given sufficient context and provocation.'
Isn't this where the work of silence and beholding is focused - in the being present both to our collective responsibility and to the overwhelming mercy of God? And in doing so giving ourselves to the hidden work of transfiguration for all people and places? Your words help me to give myself to this call more and more - thankyou.
It seems as though the more we crave things, the more we push them away.
MS- This 'Committal' in the BCP helps me with that apparent paradox:
All that the Father giveth me shall come to me;
and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
He that raised up Jesus from the dead
will also give life to our mortal bodies,
by his Spirit that dwelleth in us.
WHEREFORE MY HEART IS GLAD, AND MY SPIRIT REJOICETH;
MY FLESH SHALL ALSO REST IN HOPE.
Thou shalt show me the path of life;
In thy presence is the fullness of joy,
And at thy right hand there is pleasure for evermore.
Yours, Amber
How is proper breathing during meditation, walking to the store characterized?
There aren't any hard and fast rules that I know of. Supposedly during meditation four breaths a minute is optimal but it's much better just to led the breath settle naturally on its own as you go deeper into the silence.
Same applies to walking meditatioin: it's better not to be too artificial about it but allow it to find its natural pace
I am sure there are people who will disagree, but I think all of us worry far too much about doing these practices "correctly" according to a template when in fact we should be letting go of these strategies of control so that the exercises can work on us instead of the other way round
I began meditating, in a disciplined sense, using centering prayer. Later, an interest in Zen switched this to counting breaths.
After doing the latter for some time, I began to "pester" the roshi (who agreed to guide me in such matters) with the question, what method is best?
Finally, in exasperation, he said, "Do what works at any given moment."
It was/is very good advice.
Post a Comment
<< Home